2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1984 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. (118 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1984 Cadillac Cimarron | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 156 | Cimarron |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2844 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 124 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2580 mm |
