2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 (172 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Caterham |
Model | 156 | 1700 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 1692 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Top Speed | 211 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 36 L |