2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 298 more horse power than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. (162 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 (207 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 156 | ST 460 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2580 mm |