2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 (189 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 65 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. (218 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lancia |
Model | 156 | Nea |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2590 mm |