2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2003 Lada Calina 1118
To start off, both 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2003 Lada Calina 1118 were released in the same year (2003). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lada Calina 1118 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 185 kg more than 2003 Lada Calina 1118.
Because 2003 Lada Calina 1118 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Lada Calina 1118. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2003 Lada Calina 1118 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lada |
Model | 156 | Calina 1118 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1746 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 99.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 192 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.4 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 50 L |