2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2005 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. (162 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 845 kg more than 2005 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2005 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Westfield |
Model | 156 | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2320 mm |