2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2011 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 (172 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2011 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Colorado.
Because 2011 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 (385 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Colorado. (360 Nm). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2011 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
| Model | 156 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2492 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 385 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
