2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 (164 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mini |
Model | 156 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 164 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 47 L |