2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1952 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 1952 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 has automatic transmission and 1952 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1952 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1952 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 166 | 12 M |
Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2500 mm |