2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (217 HP) has 177 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
| Model | 166 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 40 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 75 L |
