2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1962 Cadillac DeVille

To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. (185 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 650 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (590 Nm) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. (221 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Alfa Romeo 166 1962 Cadillac DeVille
Make Alfa Romeo Cadillac
Model 166 DeVille
Year Released 2003 1962
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2492 cc 6389 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 185 HP 208 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 590 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.3:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1435 kg 2085 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 5650 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 3300 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 69 L 82 L