2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1964 Cadillac Eldorado

To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. (185 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 655 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Alfa Romeo 166 1964 Cadillac Eldorado
Make Alfa Romeo Cadillac
Model 166 Eldorado
Year Released 2003 1964
Body Type Sedan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2492 cc 7029 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 185 HP 208 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 4600 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1435 kg 2090 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 5690 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 3300 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 69 L 75 L