2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 235 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 166 | Caprice |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 6999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3030 mm |