2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1972 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1972 Cadillac DeVille. (211 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1972 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 575 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166.
Because 1972 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1972 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 166 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3310 mm |
