2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (172 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 845 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (385 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Zastava |
Model | 166 | 102 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 385 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2160 mm |