2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro

To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro would be higher. At 4,943 cc, 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro (750 HP) has 533 more horse power than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. (217 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro should accelerate faster than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro weights approximately 100 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro (900 Nm) has 635 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. (265 Nm). This means 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 has automatic transmission and 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro has manual transmission. 1992 Lotec Testa de Oro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: