2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1995 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 155 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1995 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 166 | DeVille |
Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1950 mm |