2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1995 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,970 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (148 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1995 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 454 kg more than 1995 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (182 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1995 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 166 | Midge |
Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 182 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |