2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Renault |
| Model | 166 | Clio |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 236 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.3 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 19.4 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 50 L |
