2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 242 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (300 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 166 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 166 | Tracker |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.1 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 61 L |