2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 2005 Mazda 3

To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 197 kg more than 2005 Mazda 3.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 3 (183 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. (182 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Alfa Romeo 166 2005 Mazda 3
Make Alfa Romeo Mazda
Model 166 3
Year Released 2003 2005
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1970 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 182 Nm 183 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1420 kg 1223 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 4540 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 7.3 L/100km 6.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.8 L/100km 8.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.7 L/100km 7.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 69 L 55 L