2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 would be higher. Both 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 and 2006 Holden Epica are equipped with a 2,492 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (185 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2006 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. (221 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 166 | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 166 | Epica |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |