2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (247 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2009 Holden Colorado. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Because 2009 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. (289 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 166 | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 166 | Colorado |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3177 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 289 Nm | 313 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |