2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (217 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2010 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Colorado.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. (265 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
| Model | 166 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
