2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 2011 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2011 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 would be higher. At 3,177 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (247 HP) has 94 more horse power than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (289 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa. (237 Nm). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Daewoo Tocsa. 2011 Daewoo Tocsa has automatic transmission and 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 has manual transmission. 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Daewoo Tocsa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 166 | 2011 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Daewoo |
Model | 166 | Tocsa |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3177 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 289 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |