2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (148 HP) has 74 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (190 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. (182 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alfa Romeo 166.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 166 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 166 | Aveo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 182 Nm | 190 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 46 L |