2003 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo 166. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (148 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 (300 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (155 Nm). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo 166 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 166 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 166 | Aveo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 113 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 155 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 46 L |