2003 Alfa Romeo GT vs. 1949 Maserati A6GCS
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Maserati A6GCS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT (162 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT should accelerate faster than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo GT weights approximately 720 kg more than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Alfa Romeo GT | 1949 Maserati A6GCS | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Maserati |
| Model | GT | A6GCS |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 620 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2320 mm |
