2003 Alfa Romeo GT vs. 1952 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 535 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo GT.
Because 1952 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Alfa Romeo GT | 1952 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | GT | 62 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 5425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3210 mm |
