2003 Alfa Romeo GT vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT (162 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 140 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo GT.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo GT | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | GT | Crestline |
Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 3929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2940 mm |