2003 Alfa Romeo GT vs. 1952 Mercury Monterey
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Mercury Monterey. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Mercury Monterey would be higher. At 4,191 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Mercury Monterey is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Mercury Monterey weights approximately 180 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo GT.
Because 1952 Mercury Monterey is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Mercury Monterey. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo GT | 1952 Mercury Monterey | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercury |
Model | GT | Monterey |
Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 4191 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3000 mm |