2003 Alfa Romeo GT vs. 1966 Ford Zephyr
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT (162 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (88 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Zephyr. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo GT weights approximately 90 kg more than 1966 Ford Zephyr. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT (206 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Zephyr. (167 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo GT | 1966 Ford Zephyr | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | GT | Zephyr |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 93.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 72.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 8.9:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2940 mm |