2003 Alfa Romeo GT vs. 1971 Datsun 240Z

To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT (162 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1971 Datsun 240Z. (151 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT should accelerate faster than 1971 Datsun 240Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo GT weights approximately 272 kg more than 1971 Datsun 240Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1971 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT (206 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Datsun 240Z.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Alfa Romeo GT 1971 Datsun 240Z
Make Alfa Romeo Datsun
Model GT 240Z
Year Released 2003 1971
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1910 cc 2393 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 162 HP 151 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 206 Nm 198 Nm
Torque RPM 3250 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.1 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91 mm 73.7 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.3:1 9.0:1
Acceleration 0-100mph 8.7 seconds 8 seconds
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1340 kg 1068 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4140 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2300 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.7 L/100km 11 L/100km


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]