2003 Alfa Romeo GT vs. 1971 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT (162 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1971 Datsun 240Z. (151 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT should accelerate faster than 1971 Datsun 240Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo GT weights approximately 272 kg more than 1971 Datsun 240Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1971 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT (206 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Datsun 240Z.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo GT | 1971 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Datsun |
Model | GT | 240Z |
Year Released | 2003 | 1971 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.7 seconds | 8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 11 L/100km |