2003 Alfa Romeo GT vs. 1980 Lotus Eclat

To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT (162 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1980 Lotus Eclat. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT should accelerate faster than 1980 Lotus Eclat. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo GT weights approximately 236 kg more than 1980 Lotus Eclat. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1980 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Lotus Eclat (217 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alfa Romeo GT. (206 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1980 Lotus Eclat will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alfa Romeo GT.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Alfa Romeo GT 1980 Lotus Eclat
Make Alfa Romeo Lotus
Model GT Eclat
Year Released 2003 1980
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 1910 cc 2174 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 162 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 206 Nm 217 Nm
Torque RPM 3250 RPM 5000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.1 mm 95.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91 mm 76.2 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.3:1 9.4:1
Acceleration 0-100mph 8.7 seconds 8.3 seconds
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1340 kg 1104 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1210 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2490 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 67 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]