2003 Alfa Romeo GT vs. 1992 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT (237 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1992 Jaguar XJS. (222 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT should accelerate faster than 1992 Jaguar XJS.
Because 1992 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo GT | 1992 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | GT | XJS |
Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 222 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 340 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 82 L |