2003 Alfa Romeo GT vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo GT would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT (237 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GT should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 960 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo GT.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alfa Romeo GT. (289 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alfa Romeo GT.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo GT | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | GT | E-250 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 289 Nm | 389 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Height | 340 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 132 L |