2003 Alfa Romeo GTV vs. 1963 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo GTV is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo GTV (247 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GTV should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 727 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo GTV.
Because 1963 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GTV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo GTV | 1963 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | GTV | DeVille |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3178 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2050 mm |