2003 Alfa Romeo GTV vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo GTV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo GTV would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo GTV (236 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo GTV should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo GTV (289 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo GTV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo GTV | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | GTV | E-350 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 236 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 289 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.3 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.9 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 57 L |