2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal (247 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. (164 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal should accelerate faster than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 320 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal.
Because 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Kamal | Phantom |
Year Released | 2003 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 5673 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 164 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 114.3 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 5770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3690 mm |