2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 600 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal.
Because 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | Kamal | 62 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 5670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 79 L |