2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal weights approximately 600 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal (306 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Kamal | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 306 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 57 L |