2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal vs. 1981 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal should accelerate faster than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal weights approximately 390 kg more than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal | 1981 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | Kamal | Cimarron |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2580 mm |