2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal vs. 2005 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal should accelerate faster than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal weights approximately 1100 kg more than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal | 2005 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Westfield |
| Model | Kamal | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 3179 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2320 mm |
