2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 97 more horse power than 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal. (247 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal.
Because 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal. (306 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Alfa Romeo Kamal | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
| Model | Kamal | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3179 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 306 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
