2003 Alfa Romeo Spider vs. 2010 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2010 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alfa Romeo Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alfa Romeo Spider would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo Spider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo Spider (236 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2010 Hyundai Matrix. (102 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo Spider should accelerate faster than 2010 Hyundai Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo Spider weights approximately 147 kg more than 2010 Hyundai Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo Spider (289 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Hyundai Matrix. (141 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo Spider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Hyundai Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo Spider | 2010 Hyundai Matrix | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Hyundai |
Model | Spider | Matrix |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 236 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 289 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.3 seconds | 12.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1323 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |