2003 Alpina B 10 vs. 1950 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Alpina B 10 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 12 kg more than 2003 Alpina B 10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Alpina B 10 | 1950 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alpina | Cadillac |
| Model | B 10 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4618 cc | 5425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 342 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1752 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3210 mm |
