2003 Alpina B 10 vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2003 Alpina B 10 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,618 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Alpina B 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alpina B 10 (342 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 316 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alpina B 10 should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alpina B 10 weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alpina B 10 | 1965 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Alpina | DAF |
Model | B 10 | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4618 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2060 mm |