2003 Alpina B3 vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel

To start off, 2003 Alpina B3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alpina B3 (276 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alpina B3 weights approximately 675 kg more than 1965 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Alpina B3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Riley Kestrel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alpina B3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alpina B3 (335 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley Kestrel.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Alpina B3 1965 Riley Kestrel
Make Alpina Riley
Model B3 Kestrel
Year Released 2003 1965
Engine Size 3300 cc 1098 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 276 HP 53 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 335 Nm 84 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 885 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 3730 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1540 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2380 mm