2003 Alpina B3 vs. 1992 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Alpina B3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,346 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alpina B3 (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1992 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alpina B3 (362 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Mustang. (183 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2003 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alpina B3 | 1992 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Alpina | Ford |
Model | B3 | Mustang |
Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3346 cc | 2302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 362 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93.9 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2560 mm |