2003 Alpina B3 vs. 1995 Rover MGF
To start off, 2003 Alpina B3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover MGF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover MGF would be higher. At 3,346 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alpina B3 (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1995 Rover MGF. (145 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover MGF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alpina B3 weights approximately 476 kg more than 1995 Rover MGF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alpina B3 (362 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover MGF. (236 Nm). This means 2003 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover MGF.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alpina B3 | 1995 Rover MGF | |
Make | Alpina | Rover |
Model | B3 | MGF |
Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3346 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 362 Nm | 236 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1280 mm |